<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Webfeed Decentralized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webfeed.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webfeed.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>A Closer Look - Links - Video</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:52:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Things I&#8217;ve Realized So Far, Today by rachel</title>
		<link>http://webfeed.wordpress.com/2005/10/13/things-ive-realized-so-far-today/#comment-1040</link>
		<dc:creator>rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webfeed.wordpress.com/2005/10/13/things-ive-realized-so-far-today/#comment-1040</guid>
		<description>i love those hummers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i love those hummers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on South Park Conspiracy by Adam</title>
		<link>http://webfeed.wordpress.com/2006/10/12/south-park-conspiracy/#comment-564</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 02:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webfeed.wordpress.com/2006/10/12/south-park-conspiracy/#comment-564</guid>
		<description>Yeah, what was up with that ending? If Trey Parker and Matt Stone actually believe the Kooky ending of that episode of South Park, then they&#039;re the biggest 911 conspiracy theorist of them all. It&#039;s that kind of thing that makes me really wonder if they&#039;re just trying to express their views or if they&#039;re intentionally trying to make propaganda. I wish they would just stick to comedy, the spouthpark episodes thet get too socially / politically bias just aren&#039;t entertaining and way too off-base. It&#039;s also somewhat unfair that they kind of hide behind the cartoon characters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, what was up with that ending? If Trey Parker and Matt Stone actually believe the Kooky ending of that episode of South Park, then they&#8217;re the biggest 911 conspiracy theorist of them all. It&#8217;s that kind of thing that makes me really wonder if they&#8217;re just trying to express their views or if they&#8217;re intentionally trying to make propaganda. I wish they would just stick to comedy, the spouthpark episodes thet get too socially / politically bias just aren&#8217;t entertaining and way too off-base. It&#8217;s also somewhat unfair that they kind of hide behind the cartoon characters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 10/11/06 upside down is 9/11/01 by &#187; Coinky-dink? I don&#8217;t think so. -- Thatedeguy</title>
		<link>http://webfeed.wordpress.com/2006/10/11/101106-upside-down-is-91101/#comment-558</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Coinky-dink? I don&#8217;t think so. -- Thatedeguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 02:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webfeed.wordpress.com/2006/10/11/101106-upside-down-is-91101/#comment-558</guid>
		<description>[...] Tom points out that, today, the day that a small plane crashes into an apartment building in Manhattan, has a date that if turned upside down reads 09/11/01. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tom points out that, today, the day that a small plane crashes into an apartment building in Manhattan, has a date that if turned upside down reads 09/11/01. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Misleading Advertisements? by Cam</title>
		<link>http://webfeed.wordpress.com/2006/09/17/misleading-advertisements/#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator>Cam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 03:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webfeed.wordpress.com/2006/09/17/misleading-advertisements/#comment-486</guid>
		<description>Hey Tom, 

Assuming you use Firefox, you should check out the adsense preview extension. It should allow you to check out the link without risking your account.

Personally, I&#039;d report the ad to adwords. Sounds like a TOS violation to me.

Cam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tom, </p>
<p>Assuming you use Firefox, you should check out the adsense preview extension. It should allow you to check out the link without risking your account.</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;d report the ad to adwords. Sounds like a TOS violation to me.</p>
<p>Cam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on One Million More Legitimate Posts by BigJon</title>
		<link>http://webfeed.wordpress.com/2006/08/08/one-million-more-legitimate-posts/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>BigJon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://webfeed.wordpress.com/2006/08/08/one-million-more-legitimate-posts/#comment-437</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, Technorati has not been indexing my site.  I&#039;m using the automatic and manual pings to them.  I get bupkis.  I&#039;ve double checked all my settings on Technorati...I don&#039;t see anything wrong.

I&#039;m baffled.  Waiting on Technorati&#039;s support to message me back. Until then, there is one less set of legitimate posts on their site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, Technorati has not been indexing my site.  I&#8217;m using the automatic and manual pings to them.  I get bupkis.  I&#8217;ve double checked all my settings on Technorati&#8230;I don&#8217;t see anything wrong.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m baffled.  Waiting on Technorati&#8217;s support to message me back. Until then, there is one less set of legitimate posts on their site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on One Million More Legitimate Posts by &#187; How many blogs are there really? -- Thatedeguy</title>
		<link>http://webfeed.wordpress.com/2006/08/08/one-million-more-legitimate-posts/#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; How many blogs are there really? -- Thatedeguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 15:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://webfeed.wordpress.com/2006/08/08/one-million-more-legitimate-posts/#comment-423</guid>
		<description>[...] I think the whole argument is really missing the point.  The better indicator for the blogosphere isn&#8217;t the number of blogs, although 50 million is a fun number, it&#8217;s the number of posts.  1.6 million per day.  Kevin uses some fancy statistical math that I don&#8217;t really understand(I&#8217;m horrible at stats) to weedle the number of active blogs down to about 1 million.  That&#8217;s still a rediculously large number.  Not because I don&#8217;t believe it, but because I find it amazing that there are that many active blogs out there.  Of course, the flip side of that, as Tom points out is the inference of how many splogs there are out there as well. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I think the whole argument is really missing the point.  The better indicator for the blogosphere isn&#8217;t the number of blogs, although 50 million is a fun number, it&#8217;s the number of posts.  1.6 million per day.  Kevin uses some fancy statistical math that I don&#8217;t really understand(I&#8217;m horrible at stats) to weedle the number of active blogs down to about 1 million.  That&#8217;s still a rediculously large number.  Not because I don&#8217;t believe it, but because I find it amazing that there are that many active blogs out there.  Of course, the flip side of that, as Tom points out is the inference of how many splogs there are out there as well. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on One Million More Legitimate Posts by meneame.net</title>
		<link>http://webfeed.wordpress.com/2006/08/08/one-million-more-legitimate-posts/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>meneame.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 11:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://webfeed.wordpress.com/2006/08/08/one-million-more-legitimate-posts/#comment-420</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Los números de la blogocosa...&lt;/strong&gt;

Los datos que periódicamente saca Dave Sifry acerca de la blogosfera usando las cifras de Technorati (http://meneame.net/story/las-estadisticas-de-blogosfera) enseñan varias cosas, y no todas demasiado buenas. Así, el enlace meneado habla que el 70%...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Los números de la blogocosa&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Los datos que periódicamente saca Dave Sifry acerca de la blogosfera usando las cifras de Technorati (<a href="http://meneame.net/story/las-estadisticas-de-blogosfera" rel="nofollow">http://meneame.net/story/las-estadisticas-de-blogosfera</a>) enseñan varias cosas, y no todas demasiado buenas. Así, el enlace meneado habla que el 70%&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Photojournalists Faking It? by Arthur</title>
		<link>http://webfeed.wordpress.com/2006/08/05/photojournalists-faking-it/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 02:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://webfeed.wordpress.com/2006/08/05/photojournalists-faking-it/#comment-403</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t fake my news. Tom Cruise really does eat babies.

Arthur</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t fake my news. Tom Cruise really does eat babies.</p>
<p>Arthur</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Photojournalists Faking It? by Tom Simpson</title>
		<link>http://webfeed.wordpress.com/2006/08/05/photojournalists-faking-it/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 02:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://webfeed.wordpress.com/2006/08/05/photojournalists-faking-it/#comment-402</guid>
		<description>...so we can &quot;fake&quot; stuff, too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;so we can &#8220;fake&#8221; stuff, too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Photojournalists Faking It? by Arthur</title>
		<link>http://webfeed.wordpress.com/2006/08/05/photojournalists-faking-it/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 02:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://webfeed.wordpress.com/2006/08/05/photojournalists-faking-it/#comment-401</guid>
		<description>We all need to have a meeting before we blog :P.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all need to have a meeting before we blog <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
